I always thought a maverick was a horse. Turns out, I was confusing it with a mustang… oh well.
So, trying hard to make sense of the current U.S. presidential race, I thought I had better look maverick up. Here’s how Merriam-webster.com defines it:
1: an unbranded range animal ; especially : a motherless calf
2: an independent individual who does not go along with a group or party
Unfortunately, that doesn’t help me much in understanding why being a maverick (or at least seeing ones self as a maverick) makes one particularly appealing as a presidential or vice presidential choice. (Not to mention that it seems kind of odd to think of the head of a party as someone who relished the idea that they don’t go along with others in their party…)
I guess I’d rather vote for someone who is qualified, experienced, level-headed, and smart, and who proudly heads a party whose ideals are well reasoned and clearly articulated than someone who seems to prize being a maverick more than anything.